Now Playing Tracks

indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom
indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom
indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom
indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom
indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom
indeathmayibetriumphant: He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.
Zoom

indeathmayibetriumphant:

He should open every sentence like this, I’m the Doctor, I’m a Timelord, I’m from the planet Gallifrey, In the constellation of Kasterborus, I’m 903 years old, and I’m the man who is gonna order a pumkin spice chai tea because it’s quite chilly out and I enjoy those flavors in autumn.

(Source: gallifreyans)

bronyhood:

grymmoire:

a-clockwork-norm:

grymmoire:

a-clockwork-norm:

bronyhood:

JESUS CHRIST NORM, WHY DID YOU SHOW ME THIS SONG. IM CRYING BECAUSE I DON’T KNOW IF I SHOULD BE SCARED OR LAUGH MY ASS OFF

SHHHH JUST LIE BACK AND ACCEPT IT. ACCEPT IT DANA.

I thought everyone had heard this song before…

SHUT UP GRYMM YOU DON’T EVEN GO HERE

OH I SEE, EXCLUDE ME FROM YOUR LITTLE CONVERSATIONS OK

REBLOGGING AGAIN BECAUSE SERIOUSLY WHAT THE HELL IS THIS SONG

Oh, danny elfman….

timemagazine: For this week’s cover story on the “facts” disseminating from both political campaigns, we wanted to capture the sense of being overwhelmed by often contradictory statements in a visual way. The challenge of creating the typographical portrait (or calligram) of Obama and Romney fell to artist Dylan Roscover, a 22-year-old animator and graphic designer based in Los Angeles. Using statements from the candidates, the campaigns, ads and their supporters, Dylan spent 40 hours painstakingly crafting the cover artwork. In Dylan’s words: “The fonts I used are from one of my favorite foundries, Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Sentinel and Mercury define Romney, and Verlag and Archer define Obama. These fonts are very similar to the ones used in their political campaigns. Having grown up in the middle of the digital revolution, I sense a certain lack of patience toward digital work. Instant gratification is more prevalent than ever, and the attitude seems to be that faster is better. Calligram design, like any mosaic form, is inherently slow, even digitally. It’s something that requires an immense amount of patience and dedication, especially to be done well. To me, there are no shortcuts to great work—you need to put in the time somehow. People often ask me, ‘How did you do that?’ The simple fact is, you just have to sit down, start setting type and don’t stop.” Dylan wasn’t the only one who logged extra hours on this cover. Check out the first round of corrections (above), courtesy of our intrepid copy desk. — D.W. Pine and Skye Gurney
Zoom
timemagazine: For this week’s cover story on the “facts” disseminating from both political campaigns, we wanted to capture the sense of being overwhelmed by often contradictory statements in a visual way. The challenge of creating the typographical portrait (or calligram) of Obama and Romney fell to artist Dylan Roscover, a 22-year-old animator and graphic designer based in Los Angeles. Using statements from the candidates, the campaigns, ads and their supporters, Dylan spent 40 hours painstakingly crafting the cover artwork. In Dylan’s words: “The fonts I used are from one of my favorite foundries, Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Sentinel and Mercury define Romney, and Verlag and Archer define Obama. These fonts are very similar to the ones used in their political campaigns. Having grown up in the middle of the digital revolution, I sense a certain lack of patience toward digital work. Instant gratification is more prevalent than ever, and the attitude seems to be that faster is better. Calligram design, like any mosaic form, is inherently slow, even digitally. It’s something that requires an immense amount of patience and dedication, especially to be done well. To me, there are no shortcuts to great work—you need to put in the time somehow. People often ask me, ‘How did you do that?’ The simple fact is, you just have to sit down, start setting type and don’t stop.” Dylan wasn’t the only one who logged extra hours on this cover. Check out the first round of corrections (above), courtesy of our intrepid copy desk. — D.W. Pine and Skye Gurney
Zoom

timemagazine:

For this week’s cover story on the “facts” disseminating from both political campaigns, we wanted to capture the sense of being overwhelmed by often contradictory statements in a visual way.

The challenge of creating the typographical portrait (or calligram) of Obama and Romney fell to artist Dylan Roscover, a 22-year-old animator and graphic designer based in Los Angeles. Using statements from the candidates, the campaigns, ads and their supporters, Dylan spent 40 hours painstakingly crafting the cover artwork.

In Dylan’s words:

“The fonts I used are from one of my favorite foundries, Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Sentinel and Mercury define Romney, and Verlag and Archer define Obama. These fonts are very similar to the ones used in their political campaigns. Having grown up in the middle of the digital revolution, I sense a certain lack of patience toward digital work. Instant gratification is more prevalent than ever, and the attitude seems to be that faster is better. Calligram design, like any mosaic form, is inherently slow, even digitally. It’s something that requires an immense amount of patience and dedication, especially to be done well. To me, there are no shortcuts to great work—you need to put in the time somehow. People often ask me, ‘How did you do that?’ The simple fact is, you just have to sit down, start setting type and don’t stop.”

Dylan wasn’t the only one who logged extra hours on this cover. Check out the first round of corrections (above), courtesy of our intrepid copy desk.

— D.W. Pine and Skye Gurney

When Kids Play Across Gender Lines

Instead of organizing toys into color-coded aisles of pink for girls and blue for boys, Harrods’ new 26,000 square-foot “Toy Kingdom” is broken into six interactive “worlds.” Looking for costumes, a rocking horse or stuffed elephants? Try the Big Top, which Harrods describes as “a fairground of circus acts and candy floss, with magicians and jugglers on stage.” In the Odyssey, “a gigantic space rocket crashes through the floor and a huge sun bursts through the wall in front of an Area 51-inspired space and gadget zone, complete with alien space pods and limited-edition pieces.

(Source: transawareness)

jaxtheripper13:

holdmecloser-tonydanza:

ignorantatheist:

tampa2chainz:

kingjaffejoffer:

notsodarling-:

la-belle-laide:

Mitt Romney Accidentally Confronts A Gay Veteran; Awesomeness Ensues

HOLY SMACKDOWN, BATMAN. This guy is awesome, totally gives it to Romney. WHOOP!

I love that it was that one question that made this man decide just who he was going to vote for. This should tell Romney all he needs to know about his beliefs on same-sex marriage. Because I’ll tell you what, that vet? IS AWESOME.

lol

Ouch

Holy shit I love this dude

Mitt Romney should be president of talking yourself into a corner and refusing to be open to a basic discussion.

This Man . 

whatucinurselfllberealonearth: fuckyeahgirlcrush: bordeaux-is-burning: face-down-asgard-up: gaywhisper: fuckyeahgirlcrush: thehellofitall: “GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.” Of course. Of course. MAN WHAT THE FUCK Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed. We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason. A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem). B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility. C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines. D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop. fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo
Zoom
whatucinurselfllberealonearth: fuckyeahgirlcrush: bordeaux-is-burning: face-down-asgard-up: gaywhisper: fuckyeahgirlcrush: thehellofitall: “GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.” Of course. Of course. MAN WHAT THE FUCK Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed. We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason. A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem). B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility. C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines. D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop. fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo
Zoom
whatucinurselfllberealonearth: fuckyeahgirlcrush: bordeaux-is-burning: face-down-asgard-up: gaywhisper: fuckyeahgirlcrush: thehellofitall: “GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.” Of course. Of course. MAN WHAT THE FUCK Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed. We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason. A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem). B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility. C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines. D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop. fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo
Zoom
whatucinurselfllberealonearth: fuckyeahgirlcrush: bordeaux-is-burning: face-down-asgard-up: gaywhisper: fuckyeahgirlcrush: thehellofitall: “GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.” Of course. Of course. MAN WHAT THE FUCK Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed. We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason. A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem). B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility. C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines. D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop. fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo
Zoom
whatucinurselfllberealonearth: fuckyeahgirlcrush: bordeaux-is-burning: face-down-asgard-up: gaywhisper: fuckyeahgirlcrush: thehellofitall: “GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.” Of course. Of course. MAN WHAT THE FUCK Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed. We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason. A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem). B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility. C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines. D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop. fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo
Zoom

whatucinurselfllberealonearth:

fuckyeahgirlcrush:

bordeaux-is-burning:

face-down-asgard-up:

gaywhisper:

fuckyeahgirlcrush:

thehellofitall:

“GQ neatly demonstrate their differing ways of valuing men and women. Spot the odd one out in these covers.”

Of course. Of course.

MAN WHAT THE FUCK

Yo, if she didn’t want to do that pose, she wouldn’t have. No one forced her to get naked. Stop blaming everyone else and blame the individual for the sexism you infer. Or, you know, appreciate the female form enough to not get offended every time a female is naked and a man is fully clothed.

We’re called “the fairer sex” for a reason.

A) You have no concept of the power dichotomy on a photo shoot. You have no idea whether she was coerced or not (honestly, I doubt she was, but that doesn’t make it less of a problem).

B) Lana Del Rey did not coordinate this shoot. GQ did. This is their responsibility.

C) I appreciate the fuck out of the female form. I respect it more than to just accept this type of shitty treatment. These collection of photos are not an appreciation of the female form, they’re a commoditization. There’s a big fucking difference. Nudity can absolutely be a way of positively demonstrating the “fairer sex”, but you can’t look at a photograph of a pop star in the fetal position staring demurely at the camera (especially when it’s part of a set of men fully dressed, looking strong and capable). SHE IS NAKEDLY CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR WHILE THE MEN STAND TALL. Read between the lines.

D) The fact that women may or may not look better without their clothes than men is completely fucking irrelevant. Stop.

fuckyeahgirlcrush is so right imo

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union